Art Performance and Conceptual

Marina Abramovic, Performance Artist

Marina Abramovic's, The Artist is Present, 2001 - Courtesy of the MOMA

In my Power 100 post, I noted Marina Abramovic as an artist featured on the list. She’s, certainly, one of my favorite artist. Her pieces entail notions of self with Other, limitations of the body, and physical endurance.

Due to the write-up I’m currently working on for the La Postra Nostra collective, I wanted to keep the posts on this particular genre of art (primarily for selfish reasons – I need to focus and gain inspiration for my own writing).

New York Times writer, Holland Cotter, wrote an article titled, Performance Art Preserved, in the Flesh about her most well-known pieces. Enjoy!

Back to work!!!

By Dorothy R. Santos

Dorothy R. Santos (b. 1978) is a Filipina American writer, artist, and educator whose academic and research interests include feminist media histories, critical medical anthropology, technology, race, and ethics. She is a Ph.D. student in Film and Digital Media at the University of California, Santa Cruz as a Eugene V. Cota-Robles fellow. She received her Master’s degree in Visual and Critical Studies at the California College of the Arts and holds Bachelor’s degrees in Philosophy and Psychology from the University of San Francisco. Her work as been exhibited at Ars Electronica, Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture, Yerba Buena Center for the Arts, and the GLBT Historical Society.

Her writing appears in art21, Art in America, Ars Technica, Hyperallergic, Rhizome, Vice Motherboard, and SF MOMA’s Open Space. Her essay “Materiality to Machines: Manufacturing the Organic and Hypotheses for Future Imaginings,” was published in The Routledge Companion to Biology in Art and Architecture. She is a co-founder of REFRESH, a politically-engaged art and curatorial collective and serves as the Executive Director for the Processing Foundation.

5 replies on “Marina Abramovic, Performance Artist”

Wow — I’m learning so much here. That was an interesting article. One thing that leaped out at me was that she had recreated performances of other artists. I’m curious if you have thoughts on that.

You know how many people believe there is nothing like the original? That remakes or re-interpretations are derivative and unoriginal? I don’t think that at all. At some point in time, someone else on earth has thought what another person has thought, said what has been said, or wrote what someone else has written. However, the re-interpretation, re-imagining, re-contextualization is what intrigues me. I say to the artist, “Bring forth something ‘new’. Make me think and you’ve succeeded. Does it always succeed? Probably not BUT the all the iterations help create experiences and stories that can be shared and discussed.

Have I mentioned how happy I am that you keep up with me? 🙂

Ha, keeping up? I’m barely hanging on!

I suppose it’s not that different from performing (remaking? reinterpreting?) a play or a symphony. Though of course the playwright or composer *expects* their work to be performed again and again, and I’m guessing that’s not the case with performance art.

“Does it always succeed? Probably not BUT the all the iterations help create experiences and stories that can be shared and discussed.” I like that!

I think certain topics never lose their fascination, and when art is taken up by another artist, the “conversation” benefits from the re-interpretation: it delves a little deeper. When we have cemented our ideas and scorn the re-imagining, that’s when the trouble starts. The cocoon starts tightening at that point, and we become narrow in our views.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s