• ·

    The Kitty Cat with Lasers and my Notebook

    I know this is an art writing blog but I felt compelled to write about my (art) writing process. It’s simple: I journal (everyday).

    That’s right, folks, I still journal. Or, keep a diary. I’ve done this since January 2006.

    I love the act of writing organically. With technology, the mind processes many bits of information per second. Writing in a notebook may prove difficult if you’re in front of computer for hours every day (like me – that’s right, I have a 9-5 desk job) but it’s cathartic (even if I’m writing gibberish)!

    Naturally, I need an outlet and that’s the reason why I journal as much as I can. It’s where I jot down all the ideas I have for essays and write-ups I want to pursue. If I’m roaming through a museum or gallery, my phone is my handy dandy note taker/keeper/recorder but soon after, I dash off to closest cafe and write in my journal. Some ideas get the boot while other musings garner a bit more attention. As the subject line states, posting a day has really forced me to look at my current writing process and what I would like to do to improve it.

    For instance, not worrying so much about what the reader is going to think. Much of my fear, like anybody, is that the reader likes what I’ve written. This is not guarenteed and I’m not always going to write something people agree with or particularly enjoy. As a writer, especially in the Arts, I’ve have to accept this fact and move on. I’m starting to realize the more passionate I am about what I write, it shows.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • I’m tired and quite frankly I want to go to sleep.

    Now that I’ve got that thought out of the way, let me write a little something before I lay my head down. Who needs sleep anyway? I mean, really!

    I was painting as a young artist and mostly I was painting these clouds and one day, sitting and painting looking in the sky, I saw twelve military planes passing by and they made these incredible drawings in the sky. I look at them and I said, God, you know, it’s ridiculous. I’m painting these paintings that are so two dimensional…So after that, I stopped painting…I can use any material I want. Fire, water, and the body. The moment I started using the body, there was an enormous satisfaction that I had. That I could communicate with the public…I could never go back to the seclusion of the studio…the only way of expression is to perform.

    ~Marina Abramovic, Excerpt from her MOMA interview regarding her piece, The Artist is Present

    I think one of the many reasons I’m looking at Abramovic’s work, lately, is due to the fact that I’m trying to draw correlations between her and the work of Guillermo Gomez Pena and his performance troupe, La Postra Nostra. Both artists have travelled the world performing art (different from conceptual art, which deals more with materiality). Performance art deals, predominantly, with the body. Deep down inside, I’m a two dimensional artist but, recently, I have paid close attention to performance art because it does something that many art forms are unable to do – engage the public, physically. It calls for immediate presence and attention. It also draws the viewer into a unique experience that becomes a part of a moment versus something that can be relived (everyday) on a much more ocular level (i.e., paintings, sculptures, etc.). Performance art is not something you can collect, per se, but it is something that finds its way through our subconscious and provokes the mind to re-interpret life. It also gives you the option to participate, which is something I’ll touch upon when I gather my final thoughts about the Corpo Ilicito show.

    Speaking of participatory art, for your reading pleasure, an interesting read about participatory art by Christine Wong Yap, Bay Area Artist. Enjoy!

  • Marina Abramovic's, The Artist is Present, 2001 – Courtesy of the MOMA

    In my Power 100 post, I noted Marina Abramovic as an artist featured on the list. She’s, certainly, one of my favorite artist. Her pieces entail notions of self with Other, limitations of the body, and physical endurance.

    Due to the write-up I’m currently working on for the La Postra Nostra collective, I wanted to keep the posts on this particular genre of art (primarily for selfish reasons – I need to focus and gain inspiration for my own writing).

    New York Times writer, Holland Cotter, wrote an article titled, Performance Art Preserved, in the Flesh about her most well-known pieces. Enjoy!

    Back to work!!!

  • I figured I would post a link to the wiki entry for Performance Art.

    Not that you, dear reader, have some kind of writing assignment. I’m, certainly, not voluntelling (a word invented at my office) you. You don’t have to read anything but I thought you might like to take a peek at what has been defined as performance art to gain a better understanding of my forthcoming piece involving Guillermo GómezPeña‘s performance troupe, La Posta Nostra.

    Also, please consider, the documentation (i.e., photography, recordings, etc.) of performance art becomes a part of the artwork itself. The photographs I took (over 280+ of the performance) play a part in showcasing the art. Although you may not have been present, your interest and distance from the experience can still prompt a dialogue. I have yet to go through all the photographs and wanting to select those that best capture the essence of the performances but it’s rather difficult to choose.

    In any case, I’m hoping I can do the show justice in my piece. I will try to describe it as best as I can. In the interim, I wanted to give you a visual preview. These are a couple shots I took during the show. Pretty intense stuff. More to follow…

    La Postra Nostra – Corpo Ilicito / Photo by: Dorothy Santos
    La Postra Nostra – Corpo Ilicito / Photo by: Dorothy Santos
  •  

    La Pocha Nostra

    Yet, I had to write a little something about the next piece I’m working on – La Pocha Nostra.

    Yesterday, I attended the Corpo Illicito: The Post Human Society #69 performance piece at the SOMArts Cultural Center. There’s a lot of processing going on but I wanted to forewarn you of any photos I may post of the event (yes, it was one of those performance art pieces, photos will be for the extremely open-minded and for a more mature audience only).

    For now, I’ll just say this, I’ve never experienced performance art like that. I’ve been to experimental/performance art pieces but this was intense. I’ll definitely be posting something a bit more polished in the next couple of weeks.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • ·

    ex·ter·o·cep·tive/ˌekstərōˈseptiv/

    Adjective: Relating to stimuli that are external to an organism.*

    in·ter·o·cep·tive/ˌintərōˈseptiv/

    Adjective: Relating to stimuli produced within an organism, esp. in the gut and other internal organs.*
    *From Google Dictionary
     

    Searching for Dorothy Santos

    A fellow blogger, Mo, asked me where I got my name, Extero/InterCeptive. It’s definitely worth answering but I didn’t think I’d have to answer so soon (thanks again, Mo)!The story is pretty short and sweet. I was looking to ‘brand’ myself as an art writer some time last year. I called myself, The Rambler. It didn’t stick. A rambler is someone who speaks (or writes) just to be heard but not necessarily having anything to say but I couldn’t really think of anything else. So, I stuck with The Rambler for a few months. My girlfriend was the catalyst for the name change. I mean, I’ll be honest, I talk a lot but I try to have a constant dialogue and try to conduct my research before delving into a full on conversation. She felt I needed something to describe the way I experience art and how I interact with folks in the art world. Wanting to be taken seriously but desiring a bit of flair, I came up with the idea of having a sixth sense. Curious to see what would come up when I searched ‘sixth sense’ (other than the M. Night Shyamalan movie), I found the terms exteroceptive and interoceptive. Basically, the terms were analogous to having some extra sensory capability and, well, I’ve always wanted to be a super hero. With a love for the arts, a passion for graphic novels, and fascination with comic book super heroes, I made myself the Extero/InterCeptive art writer. The writer with the sixth sense.

    Let’s have some fun, shall we?


    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Art Review's 'The Power 100'

    Okay, I’m just going to get on my soap box so please feel free to move on if you’re not interested, I totally understand and won’t be offended. To forewarn you, this is a rant. At least I’m my own number one fan, eh?

    Here it goes…

    Having committed myself to writing everyday, I’m finding the Bay Area art world rife with events and happenings worth writing about. There’s so much going on and all types of genres within the arts and so many different venues. I’d like to think the West Coast knows how to take a space the size of a modest one bedroom apartment bathroom and turn that into a gallery AND have performance art in the space. Or, turning a garage into a space that becomes fertile ground for cultures and sub-cultures to interface and question art – together. Only in San Francisco. There, I said it AND we’re (I’m talking about the Bay Area) is great at establishing a sense of community in the arts. I may feel differently if San Francisco suddenly became the prima ballerina on the world stage (yes, I watched Black Swan and it was wonderfully intense, thank you for humoring my metaphor) but here’s when I start to get a bit disheartened.  I start looking outside my environment…

    Los Angeles. Chicago. New York. France. England. Italy. China (yes, they’ve got some crazy amazing art AND they make almost everything we wear or use – shouldn’t be much of a surprise that they are creating a lot of art).

    Sigh. Big huge defeated sigh.

    Aspiring to be a professor in the arts? Talk about swimming upstream! All the meditation in the world doesn’t ease the fact I have so far to go with my aspirations especially since I counted about 6 people of color in Art Review’s The Power 100. Also, the #1 spot, typically, doesn’t even go to an artist, historically, it has gone to a gallerist! Larry Gagosian was #1 for 2010 (I know he’s been #1 quite a few times). I need to do a bit more research but the Power 100 solidifies that art really has to be part of a market, a trade, and survive as a business. Joking aside, someone who grew up poor and struggling isn’t exactly going to go out of their way to find out who Marina Abramovic (#35 – love her work, by the way) or Okwui Enwezor (#42 – was a Dean at the San Francisco Art Institute) are. I guess that’s where I want to do my part. Somehow. As much as I hate going through that list, I have to do it. I have to. I wonder how many of those individuals did NOT come from affluent families or didn’t have much opposition to pursue their passions? I know, I know. In the arts, you can’t compare yourself and you just have to work hard (like anything else).

    Art takes time. Being a part of that larger dialogue takes time. I’m starting to understand and be patient. 

    My point: As much as I have a passion for the arts and would love to affect change through teaching it, I feel that I have to encourage people to go looking for the art that resonates with them. Engage people (friends, family, strangers, bloggers, artists, whoever) in the conversation. Most importantly, to not be afraid to write what’s on my mind and from the gut even if someone is offended, dismayed, disturbed, or in direct opposition with what I say. The conversation is what ends up being the most imperative part. 

    After getting this off my chest, I’m feeling a lot better. I mean, Art Forum did start out in San Francisco! Many great things do come from this little (but mighty) City by the Bay. 🙂

  • KNiiTTiiNG

    On my way to work, I was thinking how I’ve been writing about artists that would, categorically, put themselves on opposite ends of the art spectrum. Craft and Technology. Both types of artists may feel marginalized from the main stream art world. Yet, both have certainly found their way into art museums and galleries by using craft or technology as a means of conveying ideas. For instance, take a look at Stephanie Syjuco’s, The Counterfeit Crochet Project, which examines globalization. LJ Roberts’s creates large scale knitted installations forcing the viewer to confront Self vs. Other. Lastly, sculptor, Tara Donovan who takes Styrofoam cups and other everyday objects we may often neglect and create phenomenal organic sculptures that make you think twice about how we live in the world. Craft, in these cases, force the viewer to be in the world with others.

    On the other end, you find artists that utilize technological expertise to create works that are interactive. Looking at Brian Knep’s work, the art works physically change based on museum or gallery patrons movements. His use of custom algorithms simulate organic forms in nature and showcase how technology binds us together (through interaction with the space and with each other).  Tim Roseborough’s piece, Singing Garden, the flowers bloom based on sound waves from a viewer’s singing voice. Technology (or New Media), in Knep’s and Roseborough’s work, make the observer part of the creation and brings the viewer full circle back to the self.

    I started wondering, what if someone intertwined some type of craft (knitting) and technology (new media). I found this actually exists and not so surprisingly, was featured at the ITAB: International TECHstyle Art Biennial in San Jose Museum of Quilts & Textiles (San Jose, CA).

    From the KNiiTTiiNG ‘About’ section web site

    “KNiiTTiiNG was created by an artist and an engineer turned behavioral scientist.  Artist Rachel Beth Egenhoefer works with overlaps between technology and textiles. Scientist Kyle E. Jennings is interested in repurposing technology for creative human machine interactions”.

  • The Office Marilyn Monroe [sic] Film by Tim Roseborough, Courtesy of the Artist

    Lately, it’s been ridiculously cold but I know my west coast, home-grown California tuchus hasn’t experienced real cold weather. Yes, my east coast friends, I know this Bay Area weather is nothing. Someone please remind me to not say “Geez, it’s awfully cold out” in the presence of an east coaster who has a far different idea of what cold means! I figured, in such extreme weather (please remember, this is cold to a California girl!), I thought it would be apropos to talk about something relatively hot – Tim Roseborough’s re-contextualization of the Marilyn Monroe sex film.

    What is the Truth, you ask?

    Is there really a Marilyn Monroe Sex Film? Click here (oh, don’t worry, this is safe to open up at work – the link leads to the popular site, Smoking Gun) and you will find the answer, which will then lead to Mr. Roseborough’s piece – The Official Marilyn Monroe [sic] Film.

    I highly encourage you to watch Mr. Roseborough’s film prior to reading the rest and posting comments and/or questions. Fingers crossed. In the near future, I would love to feature an interview with the artist regarding his work!

    Ideas, Impressions, Reaction

    Not knowing there was even a rumor, I watched Mr. Roseborough’s piece thinking it were an actual interpretation or iteration of the original. My curiosity was piqued. Naturally, I was inclined to conduct a bit of research to see if there was an actual sex film after viewing the piece. Learning no such film existed put me at ease since the most risqué thing I would much rather remember involves skirt blowing in her film, The Seven Year Itch. I think much of the collective fascination with celebrity lives, especially their private and intimate moments, is the need to see something outside of oneself. Much of what we rely on to escape our lives involves watching someone else’s and inserting ourselves within that context. Or, watching to make a judgement. Voyeurism diminishes or eradicates curiosity of the unknown as well. Either way, viewing the piece had me thinking all kinds of things. One thing is for sure, the piece affirms my affinity for drag queens.

    In The Official Marilyn Monroe [sic] Film, the subject is Raya Light who plays the sexy, voluptuous Marilyn. The choice of having a gender illusionist play the part of Ms. Monroe forces the viewer to reconcile quite a bit of historical knowledge and gender constructs considering this is an interpretation of quite an iconic (hetero) figure in our history. She embodied, for many people, what it meant to look like, act like, be a woman. There’s certainly nothing like gender theory and dynamics to warm your cold hands and feet! Now, don’t worry, I’m not going to start with Judith Butler and gender binary talk although I’m really tempted to do so. I want you to get warm NOT dizzy and disoriented!! So, I’ll just say, the choice for the ‘role’ was perfect. It’s art, my friends, and it’s supposed to make you think on different levels with varying perspectives.

    Watching the film, you will notice another key part – the ice cream cone. The nature of how it is consumed, the viewer watches the subject eating, which, too, can be quite intimate. Seriously, folks, you wouldn’t put just anything in your mouth (insert dirty jokes here) but quite frankly, the act of eating in the film simulates something rather salacious. Or does it? Okay, it does. It did for me, anyway. I think what’s all the more telling is the fact that you don’t know what will happen next so you continue to watch. Even if you want to pull away, there’s something that makes you watch this version of ‘Marilyn’ enjoying what we normally do – eat. Pretty gestalt if you ask me. You fill in the blanks and create your own story. Besides the slow burn of the film, Mr. Roseborough does a masterful job at creating graininess that distorts time and forces our mind to organize information in a different way.

    All right, these are thoughts (and I’m just getting started). THAT and my break time at work is over!

  • ·

    Hello there!

    I had a post ready to go yesterday and realized, this isn’t ready.

    So, I wanted to send something fun your way because a sense of humor is important, especially with art. I will definitely post again today (talk about a twofer!) but, for now, to keep with my post-a-day goal, here’s the Tuesday, January 12th posting…

    The Artist Statement Generator 2000

    Enjoy and have a laugh!

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶